Since I stopped posting regularly on this blog last May, I have found I really enjoy not blogging regularly. I have appreciated the discussion that this blog has generated – and occasionally still generates – but my online attention has turned in other directions. For one, I find twitter to be much more immediate and much more intimate than blogging.
I still use this blog as a resource for my own research and with my students. For that reason I will not take it down. And, I don’t rule out updating it in the future. But, until such time as my motivations change, FieldNotes is finished.
(I will continue to monitor and moderate comments on various posts.)
You can find me on twitter and facebook. I’m also tweeting for the Douglas College Anthropology department. That link is here: @douglasanth.
Thank you to all for the interest and for supporting my blogging.
-Tad
Sphere: Related Content
I’ve been twittering for about a month now. I like it a lot more than I imagined I would. Here’s why:
Twitter is much more intimate than blogging
Twitter is more immediate than blogging, particularly in feedback and continuing conversation
It is like IMing without knowing that someone is listening — but lots of people are
You get to chose who you follow, even if you don’t know them — which is different, of course, than facebook
Most of all, I love the serendipity of it. People find me after the first use of a word they are interested in … eg. Okanagan
I am so very pleased at the professional and personal connections I’ve already made.
I get the criticisms — ‘no one cares about just anyone taking out the garbage’ — but I realize now that you might care about the mundane in the lives of the people you know and care about. As in most things, the context of your conversation is key. Often, the conversations are more substantial than household garbage anyway.
I am on twitter at: tadmcilwraith. Please let me know where I can follow you.
Sphere: Related Content
I’ve been using the tiny Flip Video MinoHD (by Pure Digital Technologies) for about a month now. I’ve had a chance to try it in a fieldwork setting (elder interviews) and while traveling on vacation. While I have never had that much interest in doing video (professionally or personally), the MinoHD is lots of fun, easy to use and (obviously) extremely portable.
I see several advantages and disadvantages to using this camcorder for fieldwork. They are as follows:
Advantages and Strengths
Small size and extreme portability (it is smaller than many digital cameras)
Great video quality (HD quality)
Reasonable battery life (about 3 hours with built-in battery)
Easy to use
Practical, yet basic, software
Easily capture still images from videos
Disadvantages
Large file sizes (one hour of recording time creates a 3GB file)
One hour of recording to internal hard drive
Microphone quality is ok, but for doing linguistic work, it is almost certainly inadequate
In sum, this camcorder is probably best for short subjects, such as talking briefly with someone standing at a particular location where video images would add to the recording keeping. I intend, for example, to use the camcorder while standing outside with an elder who is telling a story about the location in which we are standing. It is ideal for scenery. It is not great for longer interviews largely because of the need to download the video file after one hour.
As someone who would never have considered carrying a video camera with me while doing fieldwork, I will carry this one because of its size, ease of use and convenience.
An assortment of short videos taken on the Flip Video MinoHD is available on my YouTube channel. Or, take a look at this 30s clip of commuters walking through the Shinagawa train station in Tokyo. (Note: you must toggle the HD button in Flickr or the HQ button in YouTube to see the videos in HD. These buttons are found in the video screen.)
Sphere: Related Content
I’ll be around the CASCA conference at UBC this week. I hope to see you there.
BTW: If you are on twitter, please mark your Casca tweets with the hashtag #CASCA.
Sphere: Related Content
UBC Anthropology Prof Charles Menzies has posted four short videos on the Forests for the Future website. The videos are shot in the Gitxaała community (Tsimshian) on the British Columbia north coast. From the website:
… from 2007 to 2009 one of our research objectives involved the development of social indicators to assist in sustainable forest management …
The video segments … are part of our work developing social indicators. In the videos Gitxaała community members demonstrate and discuss important aspects of local cultural practices. Our indicators of social wellbeing were built upon understanding the importance of harvesting, fishing, gathering, processing and teaching about historical and contemporary Gitxaała practices that are demonstrated in these four video segments.
The videos depict Gitxaała people harvesting resources like cedar. They discuss their practices. ‘Stories from the Smokehouse’ shows the hanging of salmon in a smokehouse and the cutting of salmon into strips. No commentary is given in any video. The videos are very neat — very interesting vignettes into the food collection and processing practices of the Gitxaała.
Charles and the others at Forest for the Future are looking for comments on the videos. The website is set up for comments. Please do so.
(via Charles’ Twitter feed)
Sphere: Related Content
Conservative MP John Cummins writes a long history of aboriginal title debates since the 1991 Delgamuukw decision. In sum:
Recognition of aboriginal title would transfer control of 95 per cent of British Columbia to native leaders who represent little more than three percent of the population. If you own it, control it and have title to it, it follows that revenues which flow from the land such as stumpage fees, mining royalties, rents and access fees for recreational and sporting activities that you impose will be yours.
How the provincial treasury, robbed of these revenues, would maintain its obligations to all British Columbians, including roads, medical and education services, is not addressed by Campbell’s recognition and reconciliation proposal.
Sphere: Related Content
Celebrating the Donner prize nominees, the Toronto Star has published a short excerpt (maybe a series of consolidations?) of Disrobing the Aboriginal Industry by Widdowson and Howard.
(I have discussed this book on the blog before. Albert Howard weighed in.)
Phil Fontaine responds:
The Donner Prize is supposed to reward “excellence and innovation in Canadian public policy writing.” Disrobing the Aboriginal Industry is neither excellent nor innovative. It is a diatribe cloaked in a thin veil of “research.”
(In both articles, as is usually the case, the comments reveal all sorts of perspectives on aboriginal issues.)
Also:
Beliefs and rituals of Aboriginal peoples are not merely “atavistic cultural” survivals that are holding them back, as book’s authors claim
Book recycles paternalistic native stereotypes (TorStar)
Sphere: Related Content
Wednesday, April 15, 2009
The BC NDP have announced they support the idea of recognizing aboriginal title in BC.
(The Recognition Act is legislation proposed by the Liberals. It was shelved because of concerns that the legislation was being rushed before the election. More details here.)
Sphere: Related Content
The Federal government will sign the Maa-Nulth Treaty (Vancouver Island) on Thursday April 9, 20009. From the WestCoaster.ca:
During a ceremony scheduled to take place in Port Alberni Thursday, the federal government will sign the Maa-nulth Treaty. The federal government is the last government to sign the tripartite treaty. Already, the Maa-nulth bands and the provincial government have ratified the deal.
“It means it’s real,” said hereditary Chief Anne Mack, of the Toquaht First Nation. “We can now really take steps forward.”
The Maa-nulth include the Ucluelet, Toquaht, Uchucklesaht, Kyuquot and Huu-ay-aht First Nations.
More:
Maa-nulth Nations celebrate treaty signing (Alberni Valley Times; April 9, 2009)
Maa-nulth, Canada and BC Take Important Step Toward Maa-nuulth Treaty on Vancouver Island (Marketwire; April 9, 2009)
Sphere: Related Content
Update: All episodes of We Shall Remain are available on the web.
PBS will begin airing We Shall Remain, a five part series on Native American history on April 13. It is showing in Vancouver on Detroit PBS (Shaw channel 43) at 6p. We Shall Remain is part of PBS’ American Experience series.
From the website:
At the heart of the project is a five-part television series that shows how Native peoples valiantly resisted expulsion from their lands and fought the extinction of their culture — from the Wampanoags of New England in the 1600s who used their alliance with the English to weaken rival tribes, to the bold new leaders of the 1970s who harnessed the momentum of the civil rights movement to forge a pan-Indian identity. We Shall Remain represents an unprecedented collaboration between Native and non-Native filmmakers and involves Native advisors and scholars at all levels of the project.
Sphere: Related Content